Purina ONE Beyond Our White Meat Chicken & Whole Barley Recipe
Adult Dry Dog Food in the 3.5 pound bag size is being recalled
The affected product contains both a “Best By” date and production code shown below:
Bag Size = 3.5 pounds
Best By Date = OCT 2014
Production Code = 31071083
UPC Code = 17800 12679
Contact your veterinarian or Purina One for more information.
Thursday, August 29, 2013
They offer to pay large sums in advance to cover the potential cost of refinishing scratched floors or replacing damaged lobby carpet. Owners of large dogs fudge a pet’s weight (always downward) and the breed. Owners of several black cats will admit to having just one, on the theory that all black cats look the same.
In a building that has abruptly adopted a no-pet policy, a dog that has died may be replaced by another of the identical breed that mysteriously answers to the dead dog’s name. Increasingly, pet owners seeking apartments are being asked to submit fat dossiers containing reports from veterinarians, dog walkers, neighbors and rescue services detailing their pet’s sweet nature and nondestructive tendencies. Some owners have been known to sedate their dogs in preparation for the increasingly required interview before a co-op board.
These strategies may seem surprising, because in many respects, New York pet owners have much to be thankful for.
In 1983 the city passed a law allowing residents in most New York apartments that don’t allow pets to keep a pet if it hasn’t been concealed over a three-month period and no lawsuit has been filed during that time.
Expanding legal protection for people with physical and emotional disabilities, along with growing awareness of the therapeutic value of pets generally, has also done much to benefit pet owners. As such, the situation is far from the 1960s and ’70s, when leases for rent-regulated apartments routinely included the clause “no pets allowed.”
Nonetheless, pet owners, especially those with large and less-than-beloved breeds of dog, say it has become ever harder to find a welcoming apartment.
Even when a building advertises itself as “pet-friendly,” there is no guarantee that a particular pet will be a shoo-in. Condominiums that permit animals may prohibit subrenters with pets. Many pet-friendly co-ops and rental buildings impose restrictions regarding number, size and breed. And since many people are devoted to certain breeds, choosing one half the size is rarely an acceptable compromise.
Economic pressures aggravate the situation. As Paul Buttenhoff, a director of sales and leasing at Platinum Properties, a residential brokerage, put it, tongue only slightly in cheek: “In the winter of 2008-2009, when the market was in free-fall, you could basically move a dinosaur into your apartment because many landlords were desperate to fill vacancies. But when the market heats up, landlords can afford to be more choosy.” And right now, the rental and sales markets are very tight.
On occasion, would-be pet owners try to game the laws protecting people with disabilities. Many Americans, of course, suffer from legitimate physical and emotional ailments that are eased by the presence of an animal. But observers of the city’s real estate world agree that growing litigation on this front includes healthy people seeking to use this route to keep an animal under their roof.
“For example,” said Sherwin Belkin, a partner of Belkin Burden Wenig & Goldman, whose specialty is rental buildings, “they’ll submit a letter on plain paper, not letterhead, that says little more than, ‘This person feels depressed, and a dog will make her feel good.’ A letter like that generally won’t cut it.” His colleague Aaron Shmulewitz, who represents co-ops and condos, added: “The norm is restriction, especially with large dogs and with breeds like Dobermans and Rottweilers. New buildings tout their pet-friendliness, but board approval is generally required for more than two animals.”
Darryl Vernon, a former member of the committee on animal law of the New York City Bar Association, wrote “Companion Animals in New York City Apartments,” the committee’s brochure on pets in housing. “With co-ops and condos, the situation is getting better, but boards enforce what they want to enforce,” he said. “Even many buildings that describe themselves as pet-friendly impose myriad restrictions.” The issues generally involve dogs because, as Mr. Vernon said, “landlords tend not to know about cats, so there’s less litigation.”
Buildings have rules about pets for many reasons. The very young and the very old may be frightened of animals, especially those that look menacing. Owners worry about property damage. Barking and howling can make life miserable for everybody. A jumping dog, no matter how friendly, can be unnerving and dangerous, and few people appreciate a nip in the ankle. Multiple cats can result in unwelcome odors.
New York is home to half a million dogs (according to the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene) and nearly as many cats, and to millions of people with assorted fears, phobias and allergies living just inches from their neighbors. Small wonder that pets in apartments have become an ever more contentious issue. It’s the rare pet owner who doesn’t have a sad and even heartbreaking story about the struggles of finding a place to live.
Securing an apartment can be arduous under the best of circumstances, and pet owners sometimes simply run out of time. This is what happened to Jennifer Tuttle, 33, a producer at CNN. At issue was Buddy, the English bulldog she acquired six years ago from Montel Williams, the talk-show host, who had won Buddy at a charity auction in 2004 but found himself too busy to care for him. At the time Mr. Williams acquired Buddy, he was a puppy; now he is 8 (old for the breed) and weighs 55
“When I was living in a rental on the East Side,” Ms. Tuttle said, “the dog was never an issue. But when I wanted to move to the West Side, I ran into problems. I looked at town houses, at walk-ups. Meanwhile, Buddy was getting older and stairs were getting harder for him. And whenever I saw something I liked, the question would be: Do you have a dog? Then they’d ask about the breed and the weight.”
A year ago, Ms. Tuttle found a rental apartment she liked in a pet-friendly co-op on West 85th Street. But when it came time for the board to approve her application, matters became tricky. After considerable back and forth, she was asked to provide a biography for Buddy, which she did, describing him as “a loyal and sincere companion who wears his heart on his sleeve.” Her testimony did little good. Eventually she was told that the building no longer allowed renters to have pets because of an unfortunate incident involving a pair of Great Danes.
Ms. Tuttle then settled on a one-bedroom rental in a small pet-friendly building a few doors away, for which she pays $2,200 a month. But the four-flight walk-up, including the stoop, proved such a challenge for Buddy that he now spends most days with Ms. Tuttle’s parents in New Jersey, sometimes visiting his owner on weekends. “I miss him tons and tons,” she said. “But this is the sad reality of being a dog owner in New York. He just got too old.”
Restrictions on pets can force a person to pass on an amazing home, as was the case with Thais Alexander, a vice president of and corporate counsel for Prudential Capital Group.
Ms. Alexander, 38, had lived in New York (with a detour to North Carolina) since 2001, and by last August was paying nearly $3,000 for a studio in Hell’s Kitchen when Hope Khouri of Halstead Property showed her a spacious two-bedroom condominium in Harlem, available as a rental for $3,200 a month.
“I immediately fell in love with it,” Ms. Alexander said. She was enchanted with the 1,000-square-foot private roof deck on which she envisioned barbecues. An ardent cook, she pictured herself at work in the roomy and well-equipped kitchen.
“I told Hope I’d take it in a heartbeat,” Ms. Alexander said. “Then she came back and said they didn’t allow subtenants to have pets. I was utterly deflated.”
The pet in question was Foxxy, a 23-pound Shiba Inu, acquired by Ms. Alexander a decade ago as a 2-month-old puppy. “She rarely barks,” Ms. Alexander said, “and she’s adorable, really more like a cat than a dog. I thought, if they could just meet her, everything would be fine. I even offered to pay additional security. But in any case, giving her up was not an option.”
In October, Ms. Alexander settled on a small one-bedroom in an Upper West Side brownstone, a fourth-floor walk-up with a tiny kitchen and no outdoor space, for which she pays nearly as much as she would have for the apartment in Harlem.
“She gave up so much for her dog,” Ms. Khouri said. “I never had any pets, and at first I wondered why anyone would choose a pet over a great apartment. But then Thais told me how she’d had her dog for so many years and how the dog had lived with her in other places and been a constant companion. Then I realized, why would she give up something that had become such a part of her life?”
Nick Koutsoulidakis, a computer software developer, can tell a vivid story about his experience with an ever-expanding pet population in his apartment. In 2006, Mr. Koutsoulidakis, now 40, was renting a luxury apartment on East 83rd Street with his three purebred cocker spaniels when two of the dogs mated — and mated again. The result was two litters of puppies.
“It’s hard to find homes for puppies, and I didn’t want to give them to a shelter,” said Mr. Koutsoulidakis, who had been living in the apartment for eight years and paying nearly $3,000 a month. But when residents complained to the building’s management about the proliferating number of dogs, it became clear that Mr. Koutsoulidakis had to find new lodgings.
After what his broker, Christopher James of Citi Habitats, described as an exhaustive search, “because when you have pets, you knock out half the places you could consider,” Mr. Koutsoulidakis found a large one-bedroom rental near his old apartment, for which he pays upward of $3,500 a month. The apartment is home to three of Mr. Koutsoulidakis’s dogs, including a puppy from one of the litters.
“In my opinion,” he said, “people who don’t like pets have problems. To me a person who likes pets is a more well-rounded individual. They’re not afraid to make a commitment.” In any case, he added, “I’m not giving up my dogs.”For owners of large breeds with questionable reputations, the search for an apartment can be especially daunting, as it was for Angela Allarde, a business manager at Morgan Stanley, and her husband, Gerald, who works as a technician in the media department at Channel 2. The household included their daughter, Olivia, now 13 months, and — more problematically — Leo, the 60-pound dog acquired by the Allardes in 2010.
The pet rescue place from which they got Leo identified him as an American Staffordshire terrier, but in Ms. Allarde’s opinion, “that’s another way of saying pit bull.”
The couple were seeking something larger than their modest one-bedroom rental in Kips Bay, for which they paid $2,065 a month. But building after building turned them down.
“We looked at two dozen places, looking nearly every day for a month,” Ms. Allarde said. “Buildings would say ‘pets allowed,’ but then they’d have specific restrictions regarding breed and weight, and the weight limit would be 10 pounds. We’d already told our landlord that we planned to vacate our old place, and I literally thought that we’d be homeless.”
She remembers one apartment “where they said, O.K., but they wanted to see a picture. We sent them the nicest possible picture of Leo, lying down with his toys so he didn’t look too threatening. But that didn’t work. They said, ‘We’ll take you but not the dog.’ ”
At another building, described as pet-friendly and open to large breeds, “they wanted pictures from multiple angles and pictures of Leo’s whole body. And once they saw them, they said, ‘Forget it.’ ”
Finally Ms. Allarde mastered the visuals, in the form of images showing Leo and Olivia posed side by side, along with artfully cropped photos taken at an angle designed to make Leo look smaller, cuter and less pit-bull-like.
These proved the ticket. In November, with the help of Melissa Taba, a Citi Habitats broker, the family moved into a larger rental apartment on East 30th Street for which they pay $1,000 more a month than they were paying for their old place. But Ms. Allarde is relieved beyond words. “To give up Leo would have been heartbreaking,” she said.
As for the reaction of their fellow tenants, so far so good. “Leo can be kind of jumpy,” Ms. Allarde said. “And he can look scary with his mouth open. But he simply wants to say hi.”
Jeffrey Rosen, a businessman, and Ana Maria Estrada, an actress, pulled out all the stops three years ago in their quest to buy a luxurious three-bedroom co-op on Central Park South. The apartment offered 2,200 square feet of space along with a terrace overlooking the park, but dogs had been barred from the building for decades.
The couple’s offer of $2.4 million was accepted. However, when the board learned about their 18-pound Lhasa apso, Dakini, an aging dog to which Ms. Estrada was deeply attached, the deal seemed doomed.
“The board was staunch in its no-pet policy,” said Deborah Gimelson, the Brown Harris Stevens broker who represented the seller and who hammered out the deal with Susan Greenfield, a fellow Brown Harris Stevens broker who represented the buyers. “But the couple approached the board president, and it was agreed that they’d pay $50,000 as a nonrefundable fee to the building and $25,000 in escrow for any damage the dog might cause.”
The couple also submitted a dossier consisting of a photo, a veterinarian’s report and a colorful description of Dakini, describing her as “spiritual” and detailing her meeting with the Dalai Lama. Dakini, it was further revealed, had also appeared in a television pilot.
At the interview, Dakini charmingly licked the hand of the board president, and the couple closed on the apartment in September 2010. The only provisos in the agreement were that Dakini enter and leave the building via the service elevator and that when she dies, she may not be replaced by another dog.
Tuesday, August 27, 2013
When Best Friends Can VisitBy JUDITH GRAHAM
Courtesy of Ann GrandisA year and a half ago, Ruth London lay in intensive care in a hospital in Boca Raton, Fla., with severe pneumonia, delirious and hallucinating that she was in jail.
With the permission of a doctor on the unit, Ernest London, 81, cooked up a plan. He would bring the family dog, Delilah, a fluffy white Maltese, to see if the pet could calm his wife down.
At the entrance of the hospital, Mr. London was met by volunteers who stopped him cold. No dogs from home are allowed, they told him. But a call to the doctor was made, and eventually Mr. London and Delilah were allowed to go upstairs.
In the hospital room, the dog ran to Mrs. London’s side and nuzzled her hand. She stirred from her delirium “just a little bit,” Mr. London recalled, and began to remember where she was. “It was a turning point,” he said. “From that point on, she seemed to take a turn for the better.”
“I love that dog. I love her so much,” said Mrs. London, now 74.
It was a one-time deal: after a hurried meeting, hospital staff members decided they wouldn’t allow Delilah to come again, nor would they let other family members bring family pets to see other patients, Mr. London said.
That’s the policy at most hospitals across the country.
But a few medical institutions have taken a different approach and thrown open their doors to patients’ own dogs and cats, letting them visit along with spouses, children and friends. (Lots of hospitals have pet therapy programs using trained dogs, but that’s a different matter.)
The University of Maryland Medical Center in Baltimore lets family pets visit their owners, so long as certain requirements are met, as does the University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics in Iowa City; Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center in Richmond; Rush University Medical Center in Chicago; two hospitals associated with the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn.; and more than a dozen other medical centers.
On Long Island, North Shore University Hospital allows personal pets to stay with patients around the clock in its 10-bed palliative care unit, as does Hospice Inn, a freestanding 18-bed hospice facility that’s part of North Shore-LIJ Health System.
Policies vary at the institutions that allow visits by patients’ pets, but many share some of the same requirements. A doctor’s order allowing the family pet to visit is typically necessary, as is an attestation from a veterinarian that the animal is healthy and up to date on all its shots. Most institutions require that dogs — the most common visitors, by far — be groomed within a day or so of a visit and on a leash when they walk through hospital corridors. Cats must be taken in and out of the institution in a carrier.
If a dog or cat wants to get up on a patient’s bed, a covering is laid down first. If an animal seems agitated or distressed when it comes into the hospital, staff members who meet the family and escort them to the patient’s room have the right to turn it away. If the patient shares a room with someone, that person must agree before a pet may visit.
“We have not had any problems,” said the Rev. Susan Roy, director of pastoral care services at the University of Maryland Medical Center, whose “your pet can visit” policy has been in place since 2008. If anything, she said, the visits can be hard on dogs, who often respond viscerally to an owner’s illness and may take a day or two to recover from a visit.
Rush University Medical Center spent three years studying the issue before its new pet visitation policy went into effect in February. Diane Gallagher, the hospital’s associate vice president of nursing operations, described some of the questions: Would animals transmit infections to patients, or vice versa? What were the liability issues? Could allowing pets to visit interfere with patient care — if, for instance, a family dog became alarmed and protective of the sick person when a doctor, a nurse or a technician came into the room?
In the end, officials decided that the benefits — comfort and reduced stress for patients — were more substantial than the risks.
Although research has shown that hospital therapy dogs can pick up germs and potentially transmit bacteria that can cause dangerous infections, those animals typically wander from room to room, while people’s own pets are expected to stay with the patient they are visiting. If someone has an open wound or an active infection, a visit from a family pet is discouraged, according to most hospital policies.
Research on the value of personal pets visiting patients in the hospital hasn’t been done. One small 2010 study of 10 healthy dog owners by researchers at Virginia Commonwealth’s Center for Human-Animal Interaction found that both unfamiliar and familiar dogs provoked similar reactions: a relaxation response and reduction in blood pressure and levels of cortisol, a stress-related hormone, according to Dr. Sandra Barker, director of the center and a professor of psychiatry.
But personal anecdotes abound. Anne Mahler, 57, a clinical nurse specialist at Hebrew SeniorLife, the largest provider of elder care services in the Boston area, remembers how depressed her elderly father was after breaking a hip and trying to recover in a rehabilitation facility. That institution wouldn’t allow his beloved dog Molly, a springer spaniel, to come to his room, but a visit was arranged in a back room off the lobby.
“My dad sat there sobbing,” Ms. Mahler said. Afterwards, the older man began eating more regularly, his attitude lightened, and he seemed determined to do everything possible to return home to join Molly.
More than 400 seniors live on the long-term care unit at Hebrew SeniorLife’s Roslindale campus, and staff members strongly encourage pet visits, Ms. Mahler said.
Harry Grandis fought off bladder cancer for seven years before finally succumbing to the illness last October at the age of 91. The final year of his life he was hospitalized five times at Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, and during two of those stays had regular visits from Minnie, his beloved Yorkshire Terrier.
“Minnie would come into Harry’s room and his eyes would light up,” said Ann Grandis, his widow. “It was like bringing home to him. It just made such a difference.”
Harry returned home to die, and on the last day of his life Minnie lay in bed at his side until close to the end. Now it’s Ann who relies on Minnie and would want her there if anything untoward were to happen. “I would be lost without her,” Ms. Grandi, 70, said. “She’s family.”
Monday, August 26, 2013
|Weddings should include ALL family members!|
We know our pets will definitely be in our weddings!
Sunday, August 25, 2013
Hosting a Dog? Check Your Insurance CoverageBy ANN CARRNS
Associated PressWhat could be more comforting than heading out of town and leaving your dog not at a cramped kennel, but at the home of a canine-loving friend?
That’s the idea behind DogVacay, an online site that matches dog owners with dog lovers willing to take in pets and care for them temporarily, for a fee that’s often less than commercial boarding. DogVacay takes a 15 percent commission on each booking.
The site started more than a year ago as a sort of canine version of Airbnb, the peer-to-peer lodging site for humans. Aaron Hirschhorn, DogVacay’s chief executive and co-founder, said in an interview that DogVacay now had 10,000 hosts making an average of $1,000 a month.
DogVacay’s appeal to hosts is that it’s a relatively easy way for animal lovers to supplement their income. After all, if you’ve already got one dog, hosting another for a few days isn’t adding too much extra work. Mr. Hirschhorn says it’s also a way for those who love dogs, but don’t have time to own one full time, to spend time with animals.
Claims for dog bites can be quite costly, as recent data show.
Traditional homeowner’s insurance policies include liability coverage that protects you in the event that your own dog bites someone. But such policies wouldn’t cover you if you are hosting someone else’s dog for a fee and that dog bites someone, says Loretta Worters, a spokeswoman for the Insurance Information Institute, an industry group.
“If you are hosting dogs and accepting fees, then that’s a business,” Ms. Worters said in an e-mail. “And if it’s a business, then you wouldn’t be covered under your homeowner’s policy.”
Rather, you would need to purchase specialty “pet business” insurance, which covers groomers, kennels, dog sitters, dog walkers and dog boarders. (You can also add “animal bailee” coverage, she said, which pays for the direct loss of animals that a client leaves in your care.
Those who rent out their homes or apartments would also need specialty coverage, she said, even if they had renter’s insurance.
DogVacay’s Web site says it includes “complimentary” insurance for hosts and guests with every booking. The free version covers veterinary care for guest dogs and dogs owned by the host, up to $2,000; it doesn’t, however, include liability coverage for the host.
Hosts can pay to upgrade to “premium” insurance that does include liability coverage of up to $4 million, said Mr. Hirschhorn. The coverage is offered through Kennel Pro, an affiliate of the insurer Mourer-Foster.
DogVacay’s site links to Kennel Pro’s site, which says its policies start at $350 a year, which sounds a bit steep for someone hosting a dog only occasionally. But Mr. Hirschhorn said DogVacay was able to offer expanded coverage for $48 a year to its hosts through a special arrangement with the carrier. (The more affordable premium isn’t cited on the Web site.) The fee is deducted from the first booking, so hosts don’t have to pay the premium upfront, he said. He estimated that half of DogVacay’s hosts bought the upgraded coverage.
DogVacay also urges hosts to have a “meet and greet” with potential boarders before accepting them, to make sure they are comfortable with the animal’s temperament and that it is compatible with any pets already in the home.
Local property-use regulations may also come into play (as some Airbnb hosts recently discovered). Every city has a different set of regulations, Mr. Hirschorn said, but, “In general we don’t find it to be an issue.”
Still, knowing what the rules are for your neighborhood seems wise. While neighbors aren’t likely to gripe if you have an extra dog from time to time (if they’re even aware of it), they might complain if the guest dog is especially loud or troublesome, or if you are hosting multiple dogs.
DogVacay advises hosts to do their own research to find out what local regulations say, and Mr. Hirschhorn said the site’s customer service representatives were also available to help. “We want people to call,” he said.
Have you hosted a dog using DogVacay or a similar service? How are you addressing the insurance question?
Friday, August 23, 2013
Animals traveling through Chicago on United Airlines can now stay in 28 temperature-controlled enclosures at the carrier’s kennel at O’Hare International Airport. (Overnight stays are $100.) Staff members will walk and exercise pets, and groom and bathe them on request. The facility also has vans to transport pets to and from flights. The kennel is United’s third and is part of the airline’s PetSafe program for animals not eligible to travel in the cabin. The carrier operates similar facilities at airports in Houston and Newark.